Watch
Listen
Read
Success Without Fulfillment Is the Ultimate Failure
What you’ll get from this post: Why the leaders most confident in their self-awareness are usually the ones missing the most, and the specific moves that close the gap. Plus a five-task plan you can start this week.
There’s a kind of leader who has read the books. Listened to the podcasts. Maybe even did the 365-day stoicism thing, a page a day, felt a little wiser for it. Ask them if they’re self-aware and they’ll say yes without blinking.
They’re usually the ones missing the most.
Self-awareness is the foundational skill most leaders overrate in themselves. Boards say it’s the top competency they’re hiring for right now. It’s also the one almost everyone assumes they’ve already mastered. That gap, between thinking you’re self-aware and actually being it, is where good leaders get stuck and good people slowly turn into someone their team avoids.
Kara Jorvig has a name for what they become. She calls them boss holes. And she’ll tell you she knows exactly how they get made.
The Mechanism Nobody Names
Most advice about difficult leaders starts from judgment. The better diagnosis starts from compassion, and it lands harder.
Assume the person started with pure intentions. Most do. Then look at the load. A CEO is at the top, expected to have it all figured out, carrying pressure and pace and a kind of ambiguity most people never have to hold. Sustain that long enough, and an emotional residue builds. It gets projected into the culture. It shows up in how people feel about you.
That’s how a boss hole gets formed. Not a bad person. A good person under load who quietly stopped building the muscle of compassion, because nobody warned them it could atrophy.
“I know how boss holes are formed,” Kara Jorvig told an audience recently. Jorvig is the founder and CEO of Allegro Group, where she advises CEOs and presidents across the country. She doesn’t say it as an insult. She says it as someone who watches it happen, up close, all the time.
The good news buried in that diagnosis: if it’s a muscle, it can be rebuilt.
Clarity Is a Skill, Not a Personality
Before the personal work makes sense, it helps to see how tightly it’s wired to the organizational work. Most teams don’t fail for lack of talent. They fail for lack of clarity, and clarity is harder to manufacture than people expect.
“I think clarity is a skill,” Jorvig says. “It’s a muscle that requires reps.” The absence of it is the number one hurdle teams hit when they’re trying to lock in a vision and a mission. The fix is unglamorous. Slow down. Break your pace. Do the work of getting specific while everyone else stays busy.
Three things have to line up. Clarity on where you’re going. Alignment across the team so everyone is translating that clarity the same way. Then activation, which is the unsexy business of moving it into action. Have you ever sat on a team that wasn’t on the same page? Most people have, repeatedly, this week. That misalignment is rarely a strategy problem. It’s a clarity problem wearing a strategy costume.
Here’s the link back to self-awareness. A leader who can’t see themselves clearly will struggle to give their team clarity about anything else. The inner fog becomes the organizational fog. Work on the person, and the clarity downstream gets cheaper to produce.
Reading the Book Is Not the Work
Here’s the line that separates leaders who grow from leaders who plateau.
“It’s one thing to say, I’m self-aware that I’m not a good listener. It’s a whole nother thing to do something about that.”
A lot of capable people live on the first half of that sentence. Aware in theory. Unchanged in practice. They consume the content, spot the lesson, get genuinely good at seeing the pattern in other people. And they mistake the seeing for the doing.
The collecting feels like progress. It isn’t, until you apply it.
Consider the leader who builds a business by being the most skilled person in every room. They started by doing every job themselves, so the whole operation is just things they once did. Then they hire well, and one day the team gets objectively better than they are, because it’s the team’s actual profession. The leader hits a wall. What’s my job now? The honest answer stings: my job is no longer the thing. My job is to help people get better at the thing.
That pivot is brutal because it strips away the identity that got you here. The skill that made you valuable is now somebody else’s job. What you’re left with is the work on the people, the work on the strategy, the work around the work. And almost nobody teaches you how to do that. You learn it through a stretch of frustration and a few team members who deserved better from you while you figured it out.
Notice what’s actually required to make that turn. You have to be self-aware enough to admit the thing you’re best at is no longer your job. That’s a hard admission for anyone whose competence is their identity, which describes most high performers. The leaders who can’t make it tend to cling to the old work, doing tasks their team could do better, while the actual job, growing those people, goes undone. Then they wonder why the team feels micromanaged and they feel stretched thin. Both feelings trace back to the same unmade admission.
You Cannot See Your Own Blind Spot
That’s what makes it a blind spot. So the real question isn’t whether you’re self-aware. It’s who holds up the mirror, and whether you trust them enough to look.
The leaders who keep growing almost always have one or two people like this. Someone who’s known them long enough to read how they think and feel, and who can hold up the hard truth in a way they’ll actually receive. Not a yes-person. A trusted one. And the trust is the whole point.
“I think trust is the foundation of all things,” Jorvig says. “And I think trust comes with skill, too. It takes time. It’s like any relationship.”
You don’t get the mirror for free. You earn the right to it by building the relationship first. Which means the leader complaining that nobody gives them honest feedback might be looking at a relationship problem, not a feedback problem. Honesty flows along lines of trust, and trust is something you build on purpose over years. If the channel isn’t there, no amount of asking for candor will manufacture it in a single meeting.
Receiving the mirror is its own discipline, separate from earning it. Plenty of leaders go to the trouble of building trusted relationships and then flinch the moment those people use them. The goal isn’t to be rewired by the feedback. It’s to be aware enough to temper. If you’re driven, intense, the kind of person whose energy powers the whole operation, nobody is asking you to become someone else. The ask is smaller and more useful. Know the trait is there, and learn to adjust how it shows up depending on who’s in the room. That’s not a loss of self. It’s a gain in range.
There’s a quieter version of this gap, too. Plenty of leaders are perfectly comfortable with vulnerability, as long as it belongs to someone else. They’re great at receiving everyone’s openness. Their own stays in a locked room. It’s worth asking which one you are before you assume you’re the brave one.
Curiosity Is the Same Muscle as Vulnerability
This connection is easy to miss and worth slowing down for. To be curious about something you don’t know is, by definition, to admit you don’t know it.
That admission is small, but it’s real, and it explains why curiosity gets rarer the higher people climb. Asking a question is a tiny exposure. So is asking for help. For some people that costs nothing. For others, every question feels like proof they’re not on top of it. The leaders who stay curious are the ones who made peace with looking like they don’t have all the answers, because they decided learning was worth more than looking finished.
Which is the same trade self-awareness asks of you. Look like you have less figured out today, so you actually have more figured out tomorrow. Most leaders quietly refuse that trade, then call the result confidence. What they’re actually showing is the fear of being caught not knowing, dressed up as certainty. A team can feel the difference even when they can’t name it, and they calibrate how much truth to bring you accordingly.
Weak Feedback vs. Strong Feedback
Most feedback fails because the person giving it makes the other person do all the emotional work.
Weak version:
“I need you to be more open to feedback. You get defensive when people challenge you.”
That’s a demand for vulnerability with none offered in return. It puts the receiver on trial and then acts surprised when they get defensive.
Strong version:
“Here’s something I’m working on, and I might be wrong about this. Can I share what I noticed, and will you tell me where I’m off?”
The difference is who goes first. Real feedback needs roughly equal vulnerability on both sides. The person giving it has to stay open to challenge back. Not a Band-Aid ripping contest, where you tear off mine so I tear off yours. Just two people willing to be a little exposed at the same time.
One more move worth stealing. Name your intensity before it lands on someone. Something like: this is going to come out strong, and it’s for the work, not against you. That kind of level-setting lowers the fence. It tells people how to read you before they’re forced to guess, and guessing is where most workplace resentment is born.
What a Kindergarten Teacher Knows About Leading CEOs
The parallel sounds like a stretch until you sit with it. A kindergarten teacher is teaching foundations. So is anyone helping a leader relearn how to show up as a good human.
And both jobs share the same hard constraint: you don’t get to control where the person started. A teacher doesn’t choose whether a kid had preschool or involved parents. An advisor doesn’t choose a CEO’s history, education, or team. You meet them where they are. You hope they leave a little better than they came in. That’s the entire job, and it’s harder than it sounds because it requires you to drop the fantasy that you can fix someone on your timeline.
There’s a discipline underneath this that separates leaders who grow from leaders who blame. Jorvig learned it from her mom, who worked four jobs and taught kindergarten and had a line for the self-pity days: “The world doesn’t owe you anything, Kara.”
It became the spine of how she thinks about growth. “I am the common denominator. There’s one person looking back in the mirror, and it’s me.”
That’s not a comfortable belief. It’s a useful one. Because the alternative is everywhere: people waiting for the job or the culture or the boss to fill them up. Most of us eventually learn the job was never going to do that. The work is on us. The leaders who learn it early get a decade head start on the ones who learn it late.
Why Any of This Matters
Here’s the part that reframes the whole project. You can stack up every kind of success and still feel hollow at the top of it.
“Success without fulfillment would be the ultimate failure.”
Values-based leaders tend to hit a contemplative season once the wins stop delivering the feeling they promised. What’s this all about? What’s the impact I want to leave? That question doesn’t usually arrive on a good day. Sometimes it takes a loss to force it.
A father who dies at 62, healthy, with no warning, will rearrange what a person believes is worth their time. It collapses the distance between what you say matters and what you actually protect. Your values. Your people. The work that energizes you instead of just impressing someone. Grief does in an afternoon what a shelf of leadership books can’t: it sorts the real from the performance.
You don’t have to wait for the loss to do the sorting. That’s the whole argument for doing this work now.
Lead With Love
One high-profile leader was asked about his morning routine, the expectation being some productivity system. He opened his journal and read what he’d written that day:
“I wrote to love you and your team today.”
In business, we don’t use words like that. Maybe we should. Loving the people you work with is the demanding option, because real love includes the courage to say hard things. Kindness that avoids the hard conversation is just passivity wearing a nicer coat.
This is also good strategy, which is the part most leaders underestimate. Remind people that you value them, and they remember why they value you back. It’s the most overlooked move in business, and it costs almost nothing. Love the people you work with. And if you genuinely can’t, that’s information worth acting on, not ignoring.
Your Action Plan
Five things, each timeboxed. None of them require a retreat or a coach. Start small, move fast.
- This week, 15 minutes: Write down one piece of feedback you’ve received more than once and ignored. Name what you’d actually do differently if you took it seriously.
- This week, 30 minutes: Identify your two mirror people, the ones who’ll tell you the truth. If you don’t have two, that’s the real finding. Start building one of those relationships now.
- This week, one conversation: Before your next high-stakes meeting, level-set out loud. Tell people how your intensity reads, and that it’s for the work, not against them.
- This month, one hour: Run the aware-versus-applying audit. List three things you say you know about yourself. For each, write the one behavior that proves it. The blank lines are your homework.
- This month, ongoing: Borrow the morning line. Each day, write down one person or team you want to show up well for. See what it changes.
Resource Hub
- Allegro Group: Kara Jorvig’s advisory practice for CEOs and senior leadership teams. https://allegro-group.com
- Adam Grant on vulnerability and feedback: the thinking behind two-sided vulnerability and why the giver has to go first
- Brené Brown: on the link between curiosity and vulnerability
- Start with Story: Max Kringen’s newsletter on human-first storytelling. wetellwell.com
- WellTold: the Tellwell conference and community for mission-driven leaders
If something here landed, the best next step is the smallest one. Pick one task above. Do it this week.
